Case |
Issue |
Joined by |
|
Raytheon Co. v. Hernandez
540 U.S. 40 (2003) |
|
|
Unanimous |
|
|
Campaign finance reform |
Scalia (in part) |
|
|
Groh v. Ramirez
540 U.S. 551 (2004) |
|
|
Scalia; Rehnquist (in part) |
|
|
General Dynamics Land System v. Cline
540 U.S. 581 (2004) |
|
|
Kennedy |
|
|
Olympic Airways v. Husain
540 U.S. 644 (2004) |
|
|
Rehnquist, Stevens, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg |
Scalia filed a dissent. |
|
Banks v. Dretke
540 U.S. 668 (2004) |
|
|
Scalia |
|
|
|
|
Thomas filed one of two dissents from Rehnquist's 7-2 decision. |
|
Raymond B. Yates, M.D., P.C. Profit Sharing Plan v. Hendon
541 U.S. 1 (2004) |
|
|
|
|
|
United States v. Galletti
541 U.S. 114 (2004) |
|
|
Unanimous |
|
|
BedRoc Ltd., LLC v. United States
541 U.S. 176 (2004) |
|
|
Breyer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Household Credit Servs. v. Pfennig
541 U.S. 232 (2004) |
|
|
Unanimous |
|
|
Scarborough v. Principi
541 U.S. 401 (2004) |
|
|
Scalia |
Thomas dissented from Ginsburg's 7-2 decision. |
|
Tennessee Student Assistance Corp. v. Hood
541 U.S. 440 (2004) |
|
Bankruptcy; Eleventh Amendment |
Scalia |
Thomas dissented from Rehnquist's 7-2 decision. |
|
Till v. SCS Credit Corp.
541 U.S. 465 (2004) |
|
Bankruptcy |
|
|
|
Americans with Disabilities Act; state sovereign immunity |
|
Thomas filed one of three dissents from Stevens' 5-4 decision. |
|
Sabri v. United States
541 U.S. 600 (2004) |
|
|
|
|
|
DOT v. Pub. Citizen
541 U.S. 752 (2004) |
|
|
Unanimous |
|
|
Standing; Establishment Clause |
|
|
|
Pennsylvania State Police v. Suders
542 U.S. 129 (2004) |
|
|
|
Thomas was the sole dissenter from Ginsburg's 8-1 opinion. |
|
|
Unanimous |
|
|
Pliler v. Ford
542 U.S. 225 (2004) |
|
|
Rehnquist, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy |
Ginsburg and Breyer filed dissents. |
|
|
|
Thomas filed one of three dissents from O'Connor's 6-3 opinion. |
|
|
Scalia |
|
|
|
Rehnquist, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy |
Stevens and Souter filed dissents. |
|
Due process, habeas corpus |
|
Thomas dissented from the plurality's ruling that citizens of the U.S. designated as enemy combatants by the Executive Branch had the right to challenge their detention. Thomas, the only member of the Court to fully adopt the government's position, argued that the Court should defer to the broad war-making powers of the President, particularly in light of the important security interests at stake in the War on Terror. |
|
|
Rehnquist, Scalia |
Souter and Breyer filed dissents. |